Your definition of knowledge is limited to empirical/scientific/material evidence,but
mine includes metaphysical/spiritual evidence.

Has it never occurred to you that your claim
to such a limited understanding might indicate
that your philosophy 101 class sold you short
when it comes to metaphysics for example?

IOW, your disagreement with me means that
you shouldn’t read my posts if no meaningful
discussion can happen. You claim I can’t KNOW
what I know, and I claim I know what you DON’T
know.