Posted by Blazer on March 28, 2025, 11:07:46, in reply to "minor risk at best *"
Previous Message
Previous Message
and we had no viable backup plan besides a true freshmen (Morez) playing 40 minutes per game if that ruling hadn’t gone our way. Because we used that roster/NIL spot on a guy that couldn’t physically play the 5 spot even if he had been the player that Underwood hoped he’d be.
I always thought a more experienced 4/5 made a lot more sense for that spot, even if he was nothing but a big body like the galoot from Longwood that Izzo starts.
Previous Message
He was a guy who needed development not immediate impact like tomi. Also not sure how the NCAA taking a year away from tomi is "lucky"?
He's unlikely to be around more than 2 years anyway so pretty much a moot point.
Previous Message
Just never made a ton of sense based on what we needed, would have been disastrous if we didn’t get lucky with the Ivisic NCAA ruling.